Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

Child Nurturance [electronic resource] : Studies of Development in Nonhuman Primates / edited by Hiram E. Fitzgerald, John A. Mullins, Patricia Gage.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextSeries: Child Nurturance ; 3Publisher: New York, NY : Springer US : Imprint: Springer, 1982Edition: 1st ed. 1982Description: XIII, 274 p. online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781461336051
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification:
  • 150 23
LOC classification:
  • BF1-990
Online resources:
Contents:
I: Malnutrition and Developmental Outcome -- Protein Deprivation and Offspring Behavior -- II: Parental and Other Social Influences on Primate Development -- Mother-Infant Relationships in Non-Human Primates -- Paternal Behavior in Primates -- Infant Separation in Monkeys: Studies on Social Figures Other than the Mother -- III: Contextual and Social Aspects of Language Development -- A Pragmatic Approach to Chimpanzee Language Studies -- Cultural Transmission of a Human Language in a Chimpanzee Mother-Infant Relationship -- IV: Biosocial Aspects of Behavioral Development -- Depression and Helplessness in Primates -- The Origins of Aggression -- Author Index.
In: Springer Nature eBookSummary: The underlying theme uniting the papers of this volume is the quest for a further understanding of human behavior. The similarities between the behaviors of other primates and humans have captivated us even before a science arose. But what is the justification for making such comparisons? Comparisons, like classifications, can be made on any basis whatever. The aim in making any scientific comparison is the same as doing a classification. That is, one attempts to make the comparison on a "natural" basis. Natural, in this case, means that the comparison reflects processes that occur in nature. The fundamental paradigm for making natural comparisons in biology is based on evolutionary theory. The evolutionary paradigm is inherently one of comparisons between and within species. Conversely, it is impossible to begin to make cross species comparisons without making, implicitly at least, evolutionary arguments. But evolution is a complex construct of theories (Lewis, 1980), and comparisons can be made out of different theoretical bases. F or the sake of this discussion we can combine varieties of sub-theories into two categories: those having to do with descent with modification, and those concerned with the mechanics of evolutionary change--notably natural selection.
No physical items for this record

I: Malnutrition and Developmental Outcome -- Protein Deprivation and Offspring Behavior -- II: Parental and Other Social Influences on Primate Development -- Mother-Infant Relationships in Non-Human Primates -- Paternal Behavior in Primates -- Infant Separation in Monkeys: Studies on Social Figures Other than the Mother -- III: Contextual and Social Aspects of Language Development -- A Pragmatic Approach to Chimpanzee Language Studies -- Cultural Transmission of a Human Language in a Chimpanzee Mother-Infant Relationship -- IV: Biosocial Aspects of Behavioral Development -- Depression and Helplessness in Primates -- The Origins of Aggression -- Author Index.

The underlying theme uniting the papers of this volume is the quest for a further understanding of human behavior. The similarities between the behaviors of other primates and humans have captivated us even before a science arose. But what is the justification for making such comparisons? Comparisons, like classifications, can be made on any basis whatever. The aim in making any scientific comparison is the same as doing a classification. That is, one attempts to make the comparison on a "natural" basis. Natural, in this case, means that the comparison reflects processes that occur in nature. The fundamental paradigm for making natural comparisons in biology is based on evolutionary theory. The evolutionary paradigm is inherently one of comparisons between and within species. Conversely, it is impossible to begin to make cross species comparisons without making, implicitly at least, evolutionary arguments. But evolution is a complex construct of theories (Lewis, 1980), and comparisons can be made out of different theoretical bases. F or the sake of this discussion we can combine varieties of sub-theories into two categories: those having to do with descent with modification, and those concerned with the mechanics of evolutionary change--notably natural selection.

Accessibility summary: This PDF is not accessible. It is based on scanned pages and does not support features such as screen reader compatibility or descriptions for non-text content (e.g., images and graphs). However, it likely supports searchable and selectable text based on OCR (Optical Character Recognition). Users with accessibility needs may not be able to use this content effectively. Please contact us at through this accessibility request webform if you require assistance or an alternative format.

Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

No reading system accessibility options actively disabled

Publisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com

Licensed e-book