Unsettling Responsibility in Science Education Indigenous Science, Deconstruction, and the Multicultural Science Education Debate
Material type:
ArticleSeries: Publication details: Springer Nature Springer Singapore [Imprint] 2020Description: 1 electronic resource (350 p.)Content type: - text
- computer
- online resource
- Society and Social Sciences
- Education
- Philosophy and theory of education
- Educational systems and structures
- Curriculum planning and development
- Teaching of a specific subject
- Cartesianism
- Curriculum Studies
- Curriculum planning & development
- Education
- Inclusive Education
- Indigenization
- Open Access
- Philosophy & theory of education
- Philosophy of Education
- Post-Colonial studies
- Science
- Science Education
- Teaching of a specific subject
- general
- general issues
- pedagogy
- post-humanist
- science curriculum
Open Access Unrestricted online access star
This open access book engages with the response-ability of science education to Indigenous ways-of-living-with-Nature. Higgins deconstructs the ways in which the structures of science education—its concepts, categories, policies, and practices—contribute to the exclusion (or problematic inclusion) of Indigenous science while also shaping its ability respond. Herein, he undertakes an unsettling homework to address the ways in which settler colonial logics linger and lurk within sedimented and stratified knowledge-practices, turning the gaze back onto science education. This homework critically inhabits culture, theory, ontology, and history as they relate to the multicultural science education debate, a central curricular location that acts as both a potential entry point and problematic gatekeeping device, in order to (re)open the space of responsiveness towards Indigenous ways-of-knowing-in-being.
Accessibility options of PDF file not available
Creative Commons Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ by cc
eng
Freely available e-book