Immer. Wi(e)der. Universität. Pluralistische Erkenntnis und universitäre Wissensverwaltung
Materialtyp:
ArtikelUtgivningsinformation: Büchner-Verlag 2023Beskrivning: 1 electronic resource (414 p.)Innehållstyp: - text
- computer
- online resource
- 9783963173530
- Society and Social Sciences
- Education
- Philosophy and theory of education
- Educational strategies and policy
- Higher education, tertiary education
- Mathematics and Science
- Science: general issues
- Philosophy of science
- Science funding and policy
- Scientific research
- #IchBinHanna
- David Graeber
- Helmut Spinner
- Humboldt
- J Society and Social Sciences
- JN Education
- JNA Philosophy and theory of education
- JNF Educational strategies and policy
- JNM Higher education
- Max Weber
- Niklas Luhmann
- P Mathematics and Science
- PD Science
- PDA Philosophy of science
- PDK Science funding and policy
- PDM Scientific research
- Paul Feyerabend
- Paul Hoyningen-Huene
- WissZeitVG
- Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetz
- bureaucracy
- education
- general issues
- humanism
- monopoly pluralism
- philosophy of science
- pluralism
- research
- science
- science system
- teaching
- tertiary education
- thema EDItEUR
- university
- university policy
Open Access Unrestricted online access star
This book is a successful attempt to reflect on science policy necessities against the background of an ideal epistemology of universities. The result is an analysis that compares the peculiarities of the university organization with the ideal of the university and uncovers noticeable contradictions. Rettenmaier examines the construct of the university as a place of knowledge and cognition as well as a place of social education from its historical understanding to the present. In the university - understood as a large-scale enterprise in Max Weber's sense - organizational concerns are confronted with institutional-epistemological concerns. In terms of the theory of science, the analysis is based on the philosophers Paul Feyerabend and Helmut Spinner; in addition, the organizational-sociological objections are pointed out with David Graeber's considerations. In the end, a plea is made in favor of a science policy and university bureaucracy that reflect the theory of science, while at the same time warning against an exuberant competitive economy that is critical of capitalism.
Accessibility options of PDF file not available
Creative Commons Licence cc by cc https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
ger
Freely available e-book